Monday, March 3, 2008

Blog #3

1. The chapter’s introduction ends with the statement, “Although traditional expectations about women’s roles were challenged, they were rarely overturned.” In what ways were these expectations challenged during the revolutionary era? What were the limits to these challenges?


The expectations of women were first challenged during the boycotts of British goods. Women began to make cloth in their households, instead of relying on imports. This solidified a woman’s role as a producer in the economy, however, at first this events’ impact was diminished by the commendations given to men for having the cloth spun at their houses. Later women’s efforts were recognized and credibility was given where it was due. In later years, when the war had finally started women were left with no choice but to take on the duties of a man due to the man’s absence during wartime.

2. The Introduction to Through Women’s Eyes emphasizes that the study of women’s history has transformed the definition of “political” history. In what ways might women’s activity in the revolutionary era be considered “political”? What were the most significant differences among European women colonists?

It is important to remember that slave, Native American, poor, and elite women all had different choices to make. Slaves made the choice to escape slavery, Native American women participated in their councils attempts’ to decide on alliances, and white women made decisions to either take the side of the loyalists or patriots. The European women colonists were divided into the elite and the poor. The elite were able to use their status to encourage Congress on different issues, organize other women to support troops, and even vote by owning property. The poor women may not have had much influence or power, but that did not stop them from contributing. Many of them followed the armies and helped the troops by either cooking, washing, or tending to the sick on the battlefield and off of it.


3. How would you summarize the revolution’s legacies to women?


For some women, the revolution had brought on poverty while to others it brought opportunity. For the Native American women, life had not changed much. Although they were now farmers’ wives and not hunters’ wives, their roles in farming work, livestock tending, and cloth weaving remained as they were earlier. Some African American women were able to escape slavery by fleeing to the British side, while others remained slaves as they were. White women also had a mixed fate as the African Americans did. Many of them now had no husbands which brought about terrible hardships. While some of the more privileged women were now left to manage farms and businesses.


4. What do Rush and Murray see as the benefits of female education? How does the proper education of females differ from that of males?


They believe that female education was an integral part of a family accumulating wealth and bettering the family overall. A woman was to have a more general education and be somewhat knowledgeable of many subjects. A man on the other hand was to be educated in a specific field to become a specialist of the given field. Another benefit to the female education would be to also teach their sons of liberty and government before they carry on with their traditional education.


5. How do Rush’s and Murray’s ideas accord with the ideas associated with Republican Motherhood?

They both agree that education of females will potentially improve society as well as the individual families. With Murray being a woman, however, it is not surprising to see her argue for women to have a deeper education than just the basic as discussed by Rush. Murray’s idea holds a lot of legitimacy, since a woman would be able to take a great workload off a man’s shoulders. For example if a woman was a financial expert she would be able to care of the finances at home in greater depth so the man could focus on his profession.

3 comments:

ProdigyPrincess said...

Amber W - Blog 3, R1 to George: I really enjoyed your extensive analysis of chapter 2. There were certainly a lot of differences among social classes of women, and ethnic barriers as well. Despite that, it was great to see that they all made some type of contribution to the Revolutionary Era. I was just confused about your thoughts regarding slavery. Although 55,000 slaves did escape during the war as stated in the book, I didn't see their escape as the most significant difference. I percieved their status as a slave the most significant difference because although they contributed heavily to the "spinning production of cloth" they recieved minimal to little credit for it because they weren't allowed to go to the boycotts. However, European women were allowed to attend these boycotts. As a result of this, they recieved the credit for the work the slaves were doing. However, your thoughts on Native American women also provided me with some additional insight. See you in class! Glad to gain your insight.

Gogzilla said...

George R#2 to Amber
I appreciate your response and I am glad to have provided some insight for you Amber. I wanted to elaborate more on why I chose the escape of slaves as my main point regarding African-American women, however, we all have to fall within a certain word limit so as to not make our blogs too lengthy. I saw the escape of a large number of slaves, as you and the book stated 55,000 of them, to have the biggest immediate impact. As we all know slaves were the best and most efficient laborers, so I believed that to take a hit to your labor force by 55,000 workers would have been a very devastating event. We have to remember that the population back then was not at the whopping 300 million people we have today, but a mere 4 million people. And to have a significant loss of a work force impacts the economy harshly, not only could an economy stop growing, but it could take a major step backwards until that work force is restored to its previous size.

RachelElise said...

Hello to you both,
Rachel R#2
I would also like to comment on the impact the escape of Black Americans had during the Revolutionary era. Not only did they contribute economically, and therefore their absence felt monetarily, more importantly, some were able to improve their quality of life. Depending on where they were able to escape to, say from the South to the North, their lives and roles within society and how they were treated would also have changed. With such a large amount of people migrating, the dispersal and settlement of these people held great power. It also showed how terrible their conditions were if so many were willing to risk their lives in order to escape. In response to Amber, if the Black women were not attending the spinning bees whom do you think would have been? The White women! And they did also! But having slaves provided them with the opportunity to participate in boycotting and protesting, it wasn’t only to do with class. If the Black women had not been slaves, the White women would have had to attend the spinning bees and would not have had the time to so freely boycott. Slaves are continuously overlooked for their contributions to the advancement of White women and this is just one case. See you both soon!